The image on the atem overall feels like it doesn't get touched as much.
If I am doing a more basic show that doesn't need any of the graphics I bring in using the software this is by far my favorite and most stable way to encode RTMP streams. Very stable bitrates, no issues handling very long streams on this thing. Hardware - ATEM mini pro as an encoder has been rock solid. Software encoders are very good at promises just test test test test before you go live on that. The flexibility is very nice but keep in mind it will TELL you it can do anything, that doesn't mean your system can handle ANYTHING. Not used Vmix enough to have an opinion there, still just learning that software. Software - Overall I find the picture out of wirecast and OBS to be softer overall with more perceived detail coming from too much digital sharpening (IMHO) going on and a bit more macro blocking. So what I can say for this is a little bit based on my experience using the atem mini pro and teradek products as hardware encoders vs using OBS or wirecast as software encoders using nvenc Cheap solutions are an interesting option as long as they can stream out. Sorry I went a bit stream of consciousness here. Bonded connection can be achieved in different ways so it's out of the equation I don't get how even stuff like LiveU solo stream with the old RTMP protocol and claim stability - maybe they make up for it with all the other features? Anyhow it doesn't seem like the best way for me. A computer can do anything, so it's all about that NVenc quality vs other dedicated hardware encoders which is why I'm inquiring.
So the fight is really between different compression qualities but then, come to think of it, the ability to stream with the SRT protocol comes in as a plus. The idea is to stream in HEVC with the SRT protocol for the best compression and stability outdoors (think a skiing session for example) and receive that signal in the actual "workstation" at home which will transcode and post process it and have a man handling the operations. We love hearing from you! Get in touch with us at, /iFlicks or you enjoy using iFlicks, please take a minute to leave a nice review: it really helps.The LiveU 300 would be perfect, but the only prices I can find on the internet are, like, around 13k? A Laptop is much cheaper! What are the advantages other than size? I would love to see a comparison with the same video being encoded by different encoders (plus NVenc) at the same bitrate.
Additionally there is a one-time payment version available on the Mac App Store.
IFlicks 3 is available for download from our website or the Mac App Store as subscription version.
The most notable ones being full Dark Mode support on macOS Mojave, as well as Touch Bar support for MacBook Pro. It is also possible to use these custom presets together with the immensely powerful rule system to create an even more customised workflow.Īs additional bonus iFlicks 3 has a tweaked interface incorporating countless improvements.
To provide even more flexibility to our power users, it is now also possible to create custom presets with different settings from the builtin ones. To make use of this feature you need at least macOS High Sierra, as it is the first version to natively support HEVC. Additionally you can use iFlicks 3 to encode video tracks to HEVC. This works just as quick for all your HD content, no matter if 4k or 1080p.
Direct passthrough of HEVC tracks from mkv files to m4v now only takes seconds, just like it has always worked for H.264 tracks. It is now possible to process videos containing HEVC content just as quick as H.264. IFlicks 3 is the third major release of iFlicks, which brings you a bunch of new features and improvements.